Christian Identity and Paul Epistemology-myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theChristian Identity and Paul Corinthian Epistemology. Answer: The followed discussion is based on two documents regarding the identification Christianity according to Corinthian epistemology of Paul. Pauls Corinthian epistemology of Christian identity as viewed by Kathy Ehrensperger and Robert W. Jenson is discussed and analysed in the following discussion aiming to obtain a deep understanding of the meaning of Christian way of living. Ehrensperger, Kathy. 2009. Paul and the Dynamics of Power: Communication and Interaction in the Early Christ-Movement, London New York: TT Clark INternational. Ehrensperger defended Pauls reaction in his letter as an outcome of emotions of a true apostle. Paul in his letter denied the dominance of the Roman elite that was being embrace by some in the Corinthians, as it opposes the value and the way of life as prescribed by Christ. Paul considered the leadership of domination and control is a direct threat to the gospel and the Christian life itself. He embraced the weakness and suffering to remind the Corinthians about the alternative way of life in Christianity and the boundaries of empowering power those surpluses the privileged elite. The Christ way of life and the power of liberating and empowering is meant for all, which is not restricted to the elite of the society as proposed by the super-apostles. These super-apostles considered themselves as superior than others which denies the Christ as it defines all as similar. He strictly opposed the leadership that was being promote by the super-apostles due to its contrasting message to the identity of Christ. Following Christ is not intellectual or religious confession, but a commitment to a way of life. Thus Paul and other Corinthians who opposed the cultural domination that advocated the superiority of some was endured of suffering and acceptance of weakness were the ways they considered to live in accordance with, in order to remain faithful to the gospel and the Christian way of life. The Pauline perception of power and authority does not lies with the dominated group in the society, but with the weak and they follow the Christian way of life and endures suffering. Jenson, R.W. 1967, A Religion Against Itself, Eugene, Origon: Wipf stock (John Knox Press, 23-24. On the other hand, Jenson viewed the antireligious polemic side in Pauls writing. He believed Paul is the Corinthian who best understood the crucifixion of Christ, as we can notice more than once in his writing about it. As we, all know that Christ was crucified on the grounds of blasphemy. Paul described in his writing that humankind live their life looking at the religious calendar, expecting something out of it. He explained that man lives the same life for the whole of his life repeatedly. Religion abolishes the radical newness and sustain man in the comfort zone. It is like living an eternal present. Man looks at religion seeking security in their present and future. The hope that all is set by the religion, and everything will be secure in the future. The good old days will again show its face to the humanity. This is the opposing thought of Christianity, which denies the thought and wants to free humanity from this religious security. Christian way of living demands to take th e risk of the future, as it will bring the risk that man will love. Humanity should not cling to the past and move forward. The seasons may not return in the process of change, but how does it matters, as the change will be towards the new. Both the documents proposed different but connected point of view that was propose by Paul. Both the authors Presented anticipation of Paul of the way of living as recommended by Christianity. Both the points can be connected as the humanity cannot evolve separately and the society has to work along to evolve. Hence, to supplement the second thought, man has to follow the first.